You Won't See Organizational Performance If Accountability Is Misapplied

A colleague of mine, Peter Ndaa, who works across Africa and the Middle East, published an article worth reading: The Performance Paradox HR Leaders Can No Longer Ignore.

Peter's central point is straightforward: performance isn't just a number, it's a system that is shaped by how measures get used in conversations, decisions, and the consequences that follow. And when organizational performance data gets used to judge individuals, the system backfires.

I've seen this play out too many times to disagree.

Peter suggests that HR has an unrecognized mandate to design and govern the conversations that make honest dialogue and real organizational learning possible. In practice though, most performance appraisal structures don't reflect that mandate at all.

Think about it. What's the most frequent experience most employees have discussing performance? Their annual appraisal. And whatever the intention, those conversations turn into evaluations and judgments of the individual. Do that often enough, and people develop a very clear mental model that performance means individual accountability under scrutiny rather than collective diagnosis, understanding, and improvement.

That mental model is why honest conversations about organizational performance feel unsafe. People have been trained, by the very appraisal structures HR designed, to keep the focus on themselves.

When people feel unsafe telling the truth about performance, we lose visibility into how the organization is really performing.

So what's the fix? It's not scrapping reviews. It's changing what people are held accountable for inside them.

When someone is judged on organizational outcomes they don't fully control, of course they get defensive. Of course they game the numbers. But what if accountability meant something different? What if it meant genuinely engaging with performance? That would look like:

• knowing what current performance actually is

• understanding why it's at that level

• taking initiative to improve it when the evidence calls for it
  

That shifts the conversation from "who's responsible for this result?" to "what have we learned, and what should we do next?"

Making organizational performance ownership a valued competency, instead of a liability for employees, is the governance mandate HR should own.

It's just one reason why getting your measurement system right matters so much. Get it right, and the conversations follow naturally. Get it wrong, and no amount of management training will fix what the system itself is designed to prevent.

Peter's piece is worth your time: The Performance Paradox HR Leaders Can No Longer Ignore.

---

If you’d like to receive occasional articles, insights, and practical guidance related to strategy, performance, and management, subscribe here.

Brook Rolter, Managing Director and Founder of Rolter Associates, helps organizations integrate strategy, performance, and management practices to improve results and mission outcomes.

You can reach Brook at 703-628-0340 or by email.

Photo © nicoletaionescu / iStock